Montage

40 µV/div
10 ms/div
37.0°C

Status

All Clear

Amplitude (---)

--- µV (--%)

Latency (---)

--- ms

About This Simulation

This interactive web application provides a high-fidelity simulation of multimodality Intraoperative Neuromonitoring (IONM). It is designed as an educational tool for clinicians, technologists, and students to develop a deeper understanding of Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) and cortical sensory responses. By simulating realistic clinical events and providing real-time control over display parameters, it offers a dynamic, hands-on environment for learning to interpret complex electrophysiological data and recognize significant changes that may indicate neurological risk during surgery.

The simulation models a full multi-channel montage, including both peripheral muscle (MEP) and cortical (EEG-like) responses. It incorporates signal jitter, physiological noise, and complex waveform morphologies to create a challenging and authentic learning experience.

How to Use the Simulator

The interface is composed of three primary components: the Montage Panel (left), the central Waveform Display, and the Control & Information Panels.

Advanced Features

This simulation includes several advanced features that make it more physiologically accurate:

  1. Enhanced MEP Morphology: Muscle MEPs display realistic triphasic patterns with initial positive, main negative, and terminal positive phases, accurately reflecting motor unit action potentials.
  2. Realistic D-wave and I-wave Components: Cortical recordings include direct waves (D-waves) and multiple indirect waves (I-waves) with physiologically correct latency differences.
  3. Frequency-Specific Noise and Artifacts: The simulation includes baseline drift, physiological tremor, power line interference with harmonics, and realistic motion and cautery artifacts.
  4. Trial-to-Trial Variability: The simulator models facilitation and fatigue effects with repeated stimulation, mimicking actual neurophysiological responses during surgery.
  5. Temperature Effects: The temperature control simulates the impact of patient temperature on MEP amplitude and latency, providing a realistic representation of common clinical variables.
  6. Anesthesia-Specific Effects: The simulation accounts for differential effects of anesthesia on D-waves versus I-waves and shows appropriate distal-to-proximal gradient effects on muscles.

Potential Future Enhancements

This simulation serves as a robust platform for exploring the challenges of real-time IONM data analysis. Future development could expand its capabilities to further bridge the gap between simulation and clinical practice:

  1. Automated Measurement Cursors: Implement logic to automatically place measurement cursors on waveforms to calculate peak-to-peak amplitude and onset latency, mirroring the functionality of clinical IONM software.
  2. Machine Learning Integration: Utilize the simulation to generate a large, labeled dataset for training machine learning models. A model could be trained to automatically classify waveform changes (e.g., "Normal," "Surgical Event," "Anesthetic Fade"), providing a foundation for a real-time decision support system.
  3. Multiple Stimulation Paradigms: Add various stimulation protocols like paired-pulse, train-of-four, and repetitive stimulation with different frequencies to simulate more complex intraoperative testing scenarios.